|
SKBI Newsletter | December 2025 Case Insights: Impacts of U.S. Environmental Regulations on Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency covering the past forty years, the study looks at major laws such as the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, as well as newer policies like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The research finds that while penalty-based regulations such as CCER can make companies comply quickly, they don’t usually lead to long-term changes. In contrast, incentive-based policies such as MBER & IRA encourage firms to invest in greener technologies and adopt more sustainable practices. By examining real cases like Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and BP’s oil spill, the paper shows how different types of regulations shape corporate behaviour. It concludes that the best approach is a multifaceted regulatory approach that balances corporate responsibility, cost-efficiency, and environmental protection. |
|
|
What this means for policymakers? |
What this means for Industry? |
|
Penalty-driven regulations enforce short-term compliance but often fail to secure lasting behavioural changes. |
Noncompliance brings immense financial, reputational, and operational risks, as seen in Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and BP’s oil spill. |
|
Market-based frameworks show how subsidies and funding can catalyse innovation, accelerate clean energy transitions, and reduce enforcement burdens. |
However, crises can also trigger transformation, with firms investing heavily in green technologies and restructuring governance. |
|
A hybrid strategy—combining deterrent penalties with incentives—may yield both compliance and long-term sustainability. |
Proactively adopting sustainable practices reduces regulatory risks and positions firms competitively in a market increasingly shaped by environmental responsibility. |
|
About SKBI: |
|
|
About SKBI Case Insights: |
|
|
© Copyright 2025 by Singapore Management University. All Rights Reserved. |
|